/
/
CMA Raises Concerns Over the nexfibre–Netomnia Deal
UK broadband / Competition ruling

CMA Raises Concerns Over the nexfibre–Netomnia Deal

The regulator’s provisional finding puts a major UK full-fibre takeover in doubt. Its central concern is the number of wholesale networks that would compete for ISPs.

Published: 2 Oct 2026Updated: 2 Oct 2026By Hasnaat Mahmood

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) says nexfibre’s planned acquisition of Substantial, the group behind Netomnia and YouFibre, may substantially lessen competition in wholesale fixed broadband. The finding, released on 2 October 2026, is provisional. The CMA has not blocked the transaction or made a final decision.

The concern is about the terms on which internet providers can buy access to fibre networks. Less pressure between network owners could ultimately mean weaker deals for households and businesses, the CMA says.

In brief: The deal remains under review. The CMA thinks it could remove an important wholesale rival from parts of the combined fibre footprint, but is inviting responses before reaching its final decision.
Provisional finding · Deal not completed

Why CityFibre matters to this decision

The CMA is comparing the proposed nexfibre purchase with what it believes would most likely happen without this deal. Its provisional view is that CityFibre would have acquired Substantial’s network and sold the retail business to a separate ISP. That is a regulatory assessment of a possible alternative, not an agreed CityFibre takeover.

On that comparison, CityFibre and nexfibre/Virgin Media O2 would have competed to supply other broadband providers in places where their networks overlap. Under the proposed deal, the Netomnia network would instead join nexfibre. For a plain-English explanation of the underlying business model, see our guide to the nexfibre–Netomnia merger and CMA investigation.

CMA’s likely alternativeCityFibre buys Substantial

In the relevant overlap, the CMA expects wholesale competition between Openreach, CityFibre and nexfibre/VMO2.

Proposed nexfibre dealSubstantial joins nexfibre

In that overlap, the CMA expects Openreach and nexfibre/VMO2 to remain as the two wholesale network rivals.

These are the CMA’s provisional comparison scenarios, not completed transactions or a prediction that every address has exactly these networks.
14%of the VMO2/nexfibre footprint overlaps Substantial in the CMA’s analysis
32% → 18%of that footprint with three wholesale networks in the CMA’s before-and-after comparison
23 Octdeadline for responses to the provisional findings

The network percentages use the CMA’s scenario in which Virgin Media O2 upgrades its cable network to full fibre. They describe areas of network overlap, not the share of customers who would change provider.

Could a bigger fibre network still help?

The companies argue that combining their networks would support investment and create a stronger wholesale challenger to Openreach. They also say it could speed Virgin Media O2’s move from cable to full fibre.

The CMA acknowledges some extra scale, but provisionally finds that the claimed benefits are either insufficient to outweigh the competition concern or have not been shown to depend on this particular merger. It notes that Substantial’s network could also have been opened to ISPs under its CityFibre comparison.

Its concern is specific to this transaction and the overlap between these networks. The CMA explicitly says its finding is not a general verdict on all UK altnet consolidation. The original £2bn nexfibre acquisition proposal remains subject to regulatory review.

What does this mean for YouFibre customers?

There is no immediate change to a customer’s connection or contract because of today’s interim report. The announced plan for the retail business to move to Virgin Media O2 is conditional on the deal proceeding. Customers should rely on direct notices from their provider for any eventual change. The earlier Brsk-to-YouFibre retail rebrand is a separate, already completed change.

The dates that now matter

The parties can respond to the findings and put forward possible remedies. The published timetable gives stakeholders until 23 October to comment, while the CMA’s statutory deadline for its final decision is 15 December 2026. Neither deadline means the acquisition automatically completes on that date.

CMA publishes its provisional competition finding.
Deadline for a completed remedies form if the parties choose to submit one.
Deadline for interested parties to respond to the interim findings.
Current statutory deadline for the CMA’s final Phase 2 decision.
The takeaway

The CMA has raised a substantial wholesale competition concern, using a possible CityFibre purchase as its comparison. It is still a provisional finding. The next material development will be the parties’ response and any proposed remedy, followed by the CMA’s final decision.

FAQs

Has the CMA blocked the nexfibre–Netomnia deal?

No. The CMA has issued a provisional finding that the proposed acquisition may substantially lessen competition in wholesale fixed broadband. Its final decision has not been made.

Why does CityFibre appear in the CMA’s findings?

The CMA provisionally considers a CityFibre purchase of Substantial the most likely alternative if the nexfibre deal did not happen. That is a comparison used in its assessment, not a completed or agreed CityFibre acquisition.

Does the ruling change YouFibre customers’ broadband today?

No. The interim finding does not itself change existing service or contract terms. Any future customer-facing change would depend on what happens to the proposed transaction and on provider communications.

When is the CMA’s final decision due?

The CMA lists 15 December 2026 as the current statutory deadline for its Phase 2 decision. Responses to the provisional findings are due by 23 October 2026.

Hasnaat Mahmood
Written byHasnaat Mahmood

UK broadband and telecoms coverage for FindCheapBroadband.